Search results

I was talking about the move to say strike ballots needed to be passed by 40% of the potential electorate rather than by a majority of those who voted

I thought 40% was the magic number that infers legitimacy?

Go on, tell me that story again about those nasty unions in the past who slagged you off for crossing a picket line. I never tire of hearing that one, just to help all us poor lefties to understand your viewpoint once again Thanks in advance, ever yours, The prosecco socialist

You're right of course Tories use plebs

You just had to didn't you :banana: And don't forget, I know your face and when I see you again,.... I'll ignore ya

No we haven't. But if anybody says labour are bad losers once more I'm going to rip their heads off and shit down their necks whilst singing take that you tory Scum ....some of the above may not be true

Whilst I understand the calls for switching voting method, I do like the idea of seeing a relationship between an mp and their constituency. Having party lists makes it much harder for true independents to make their mark. But its also difficult to draw a true parallel between votes cast in...

C'mon you tories. You won, you're not some kind of oppressed minority. Last I saw you got most votes and most seats - not directly correlated and less than the 40% you want unions to get, but most nonetheless Have the courage of your convictions and laugh it off