Search results

I know that the lma rarely quote on cases. I have no way of knowing if they are any more or any less accurate than the clubs version of events. I doubt it was that planned and it took a couple of hours to react from the clubs statement. The length and detail was consistent in something put...

I agree entirely. I too work in a hr business and have been involved on both sides (acting for the company as well as advising friends and colleagues against companies). As I have been saying all along, the leaks and statements from the club havnt helped. When I read the club statement...

Its fairly simple. I accuse you of shooting my cat. You know you didn't do it. I then say, here's 500 pages which I will use to back up my case. You then ask me to particularise what on those 500 pages supports my claim and then you can break down my arguments 1 by 1 to prove you didn't do it...

That would mean gus, his lawyers and the lma ignoring the club. I find that highly unlikely. Even the club statement seems to infer that they knew he wasn't coming, they just didn't accept his reasons.

You can paint me whatever way you like if it suits reinforcing your view. But read the comments of some journalists who post on nsc - none of whom are part or any imagined clique. Bottom line is the club has a hr manager (not barber) who may be following one line. The club also has a comms team...

Its not unusual for a professional body rep to be unavailable at short notice. Its actually quite usual especially during the core holiday period for his industry. Put me down in the wanting to see employment law enacted correctly camp.

So the drip of info last week on thurs that a meeting would take place on Friday, and then the brieifing given to a journalist or two on Friday that Gus hasn't attended was cock up rather than conspiracy? So how do we explain that the club issue a statement today saying Gus failed to attend due...

So do I. I was no more 'in' with the old structure than I am with the current group. The irony in all this is that the club leaks more now than it ever did - probably due to its size and probably due to a strategy of allowing more information to ooze out.

He did notify his availability as did the lma. The club chose to start without him and publicly said they disputed his point of process that now seems to be exercising his right to be treated in accordance with the company's own handbook.

8 cahrges to face according to an ealier leak. Say 30 people interviewed and two pages of evidence on each charge or instance, its not that hard. I have been involved in employer matters that have gone into 2000 plus pages.

And what's him being on telly last night got to do with the availability of his professional body representative?. It looks like the club aren't handling this as well as they would like. For heavens sake, not even abiding by your own employee handbook. That's basic stuff. As for the spin spin...