Search results

Yes but for those of us brought up on “ the benefit of the doubt is always to the batsman” if it is inconclusive then he is not out!

I am not sure he did. I think it was more of “ oh **** here we go again” I suppose this is the result when you take away the doubt from umpires and rely of technology, that when you actually look at the coverage looked dodgy to say the least.... I am old school and would do away with all...

Was it Kolhi who changed his bat in the Indian series when he swished at the ball, there was loud click and it turned out it was the splice of the bat creaking! As much as I do not like Warner, I would have been bloody livid if I had been given out caught behind to that!