A QPR supporting mate says that they have heard on the grapevine that if they are relegated, and the FFP rules kick in, the football league will not accept them and they will have to start again in the conference.
I can't see it, but he thinks that the owners will spend stupid money in January...
I am not sure that answers my question. So let's take a hypothetical case. A director is recruited called say Sheik abdullah and as part of his remit, he puts in £50 million, as purchase of shares that he has earmarked to use on players to get to the Premiership. Are you suggesting, or not...
Maybe El pres can answer that one, because if we are suggesting that a director can't put in a donation/ share issue etc to raise funds, then how are clubs expected to raise those funds to compete?
So therefore by inference, only teams with parachute payments or ones that play bargain hunt...
I think the comment about our revenues and championship/ premiership football is very telling. So basically what is bring said is even with a sugar daddy bankrolling us, we can't compete with teams with parachute payments....well notts forest and derby buck that trend, as did palace really...
It will only rise if the results get better. We have a difficult game on satdi, my boys soon and then Rotherham who are no pushover either. If we dont win those, we could be flirting with the bottom teams!
But being positive, we could win them all and all is rosy again
This is definitely a THIS.
I have never suggested people boycott buying anything from the club, I have just chosen not to as in my case there is better food and drink available elsewhere...but I am also not one who goes to footy to eat and drink. I go to watch football and carry on the...
Oh Christ..he has had a go at me for being a bad, non eating and buying tat, fan.
What has happened to the 8 million we received for ulloa? Has that gone into the pot or has that been ring Fenced?