Search results

Thanks.

If that had happened, then we'd have seen an improvement in the 'lot' of the strikers. I'd suggest that suggests that Ashworth didn't intervene in this supposed issue; whether he should have, who knows?

I hope Chris Hughton has the sort of personality that doesn't fall to pieces when a new person joins the management team. So, to be clear, are you suggesting Ashworth's mere presence could have adversely affected Chris' ability to manage the team, or do you think Ashworth has said / done /...

The Argus article published here 1127987798370209794 Written by Naylor says that Ashworth was not involved in the decision to sack Hughton. So, you could read that as proof that we wasn't involved, OR he was and the club are at pains to suggest he wasn't.

Nah. You're reaching here.