Search results

I agree. That said there is absolutely no chance I will watch this, it is going to be stage managed BS from beginning to end and edited to f*** for legal reasons. If it was live and the interviewer was someone with an ounce of journalistic integrity I might have considered it but I am not...

Welcome aboard Schleck. You may find NSC's cycling geeks are not big fans of the Schleck brothers. If I could be bothered I would hunt out a post from the 2011 Tour thread that sums up my feelings towards these two wasters, it was top rant even if I do say so myself.

Yes, he probably would have still been good enough, providing everyone else was clean. Problem is the majority were doped in this period, so it is hard to say. Armstrong may just have had the capacity to cope with vast amounts doping products, whereas others did/may not, who really knows? One...

It is not so much those types of stages that are the true sign of a cleaner peleton for me, more the high mountains, the way Contador (and my namesake for that matter) would repeatedly attack, let people get to their wheel, attack again and again and again all the way up 20/25km climbs. Those...

I was just about to do this, so thanks for saving me the time. This tells you all you need to know, I don't think the fact that Armstrong doped stops him being a great cyclist though, unfortunately the sport was tarnished for most of it's history with this sort of thing. Sadly they were all up...