Search results

The interpretation is attempting to play or interfering with the opponent. The likelihood is any player who is in an offside position and moves to the ball or is in line of the ball and the opponent and thus stops him from progressing toward it is offside first. Too wish washy though. Let’s...

Right down to the last decision it’s now obvious the premier league want Liverpool to win it. Never seen so many offsides go one way..

Wow thanks for that Mind you as I put the first offence is considered the infringement however in this case wow again.

So wrong i’m afraid the law is the heading the rule is the detail as per the rule book. Old saying I know but the truth is it is incorrect.

In an offside position blah blah and interfering with play OR the opposition ability to play the ball. Interfering with play "playing or touching the ball passed or touched by a team-mate"[1] Interfering with an opponent "preventing an opponent from playing or being able to play the ball by...

Please show me defined evidence of that rule. The first offence takes precedence. The only action that can be taken is if dangerous play occurs, the player can be booked/sent off but the restart is the offside.

Well you’re stupid, I tell thee.

Always amazes me the ignorance of players and supporters alike. Even had a discussion with a mate over the 10m mark on the goal line away from the corner quadrant. Which for the thick ones is not 10m from the flag!!