Search results

Yes, all of this.... Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[emoji23]sure. But I'd prefer the complete performance Fulham, Brentford, Leeds, QPR last season with the goals you mention. All reasonable teams. It's great that we are having a discussion on the style of winning, rather than if we will win! Tough one today, would take a point. Sent from...

First half vs Forest very even, the goal changed the game. Leeds should have been destroyed as they were awful, but yes we did dominate. MK A we dominated last year, the last minute pen, would have been a travesty. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Fulham A - very fortunate. QPR - first half Bong saved us. Great second half Villa - were difficult to crack I think there were others, but we seem to kick on in the second half of games. The difference is how solid we are. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

So you agree we started to dominate teams albeit in the second half of the season? Norwich aside, we haven't yet and are still top! [emoji2] I am talking about the second half, but haven't made it clear. If you look at my initial post, I think it's good we have several levels to go up...

Sure, I may be having a convenient memory, but whilst we are more solid, I felt we gave more 'complete' performances in terms of domination last season. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Yes, but last year we destroyed teams, which is good viewing and better for my health. I'm not complaining, but playing within yourself and scraping victories is all very well until you concede late on (though this has only happened vs Preston). Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I don't think it is .......... yet. We are starting games more slowly, whereas I feel we are at our best when we are 'zipping' the ball about and working teams from side to side. In the majority of games this has been the significant difference in the second half. The good news is we have...