Search results

The extra costs of employers NIC and having to set up and pay into pensions for them might mean that they will take less people on so some people could lose out on a job and it will be lower paid employees who might be the losers in such scenarios

I agree and noticed that but see last 2 lines of my post before that as below. If they win these cases they will in time start to get on top of those employers as well. They need Legislation behind them to go after those employers. Hence taking cases to Tribunals to obtain Rulings from the...

Actually , although there are written rules on this. The interpretation of the written law is often interpreted differently for ''tax avoidance purposes'' HMRC don't take action because they do not have ''court legislation'' on their side just yet. If they win these cases then they will have...

These cases are not actually against the individuals. They are against the BBC ''Under IR35 Regulations'' and if the BBC lose then it will be they who need to meet the shortfall in tax if the courts find that the they should have been paid as employees. A lot of people thought HMRC would not...