Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

Search results

  1. Nobby

    [Football] Its simple, copy cricket and tennis.

    Who knows? I certainly don’t, like I don’t know at any point during a game if what I am watching is what I am watching. I may be watching a passage of play that could be turned over at any time. And that’s part of the problem of this utterly shambolic introduction of a potentially useful...
  2. Nobby

    [Football] Its simple, copy cricket and tennis.

    For how long? Have we won the Watford game yet?
  3. Nobby

    [Football] Its simple, copy cricket and tennis.

    Come on now, be serious After a potential VAR incident, you want to wait for a break in play, before it gets queried. That could take five minutes. Sorry but that’s just very bizarre
  4. Nobby

    [Football] Its simple, copy cricket and tennis.

    Give the VAR refs 10 seconds to decide Then onfield decision stands - at least we would know what’s going on
  5. Nobby

    [Football] Its simple, copy cricket and tennis.

    Me neither. It was so obvious this was going to happen. Refs are still refs whether on the pitch or in an office somewhere And the way the Premier League have implemented it is even worse than in the World Cup. Onfield refs have no say at all in major decisions
  6. Nobby

    [Football] Its simple, copy cricket and tennis.

    One of the more bizarre posts on NSC for a while
  7. Nobby

    [Football] Its simple, copy cricket and tennis.

    Hate VAR with a passion. IT experts and wannabe refs managing a game from 100 miles away. Armchair fans having an advantage over fans attending games
  8. Nobby

    [Football] Its simple, copy cricket and tennis.

    Take out the last bit on the ref and I’m in. Trigaar obviously doesn’t go to watch live.
Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top
Link Here