Seems like you're dodging questions! Perhaps in fear of SMEARING your good friend.
He states a maximum permitted loss figure not exceeding 500k, moreover he doesn't even subtract that 500k for the sake of argument in his FFP max loss table. This seems grossly inaccurate when you consider we are...
As I thought. So the doom-mongering in that article about us potentially facing a whole host of penalties is entirely baseless I presume?
It appears to suggest that permitted losses rarely exceed 500k whereas based on your predictions ours are in excess of 13M.
They have inserted a 25.9M operating loss in an FFP loss table? Great reporting.
It also states that loss exclusions rarely exceed 500k?
Calling El Presidente