Search results

I agree that it is quite possible for someone to play roulette only a few times and be "up". It is, however, more extremely dangerous talk on a thread about compulsive gambling that has included a whole crock of bullshit about winning roulette systems..!!!

Keep up at the back Tubthumper... @Justice has in fact already been very generous in sharing the basis of his winning approach at the wheel... "Think of areas rather than specific numbers, always go with the dealer, stay away from fast wheels don't bet until the dealer has spun at least 10...

Loving the "amongst other things"... :) Finally we have the truth. You play roulette only occasionally, for "fun", and have lost approximately 2.7% of the total you have staked over the years (which is probably quite a lot of money when added up). Please stop the gibberish about...

Why does he need to know you to assert that you have talked some crap in this thread (which you have)...?

Yes, I agree that does sound even more dangerously full of bunkum than the basic Martingale. It brings to mind a classic Alan Partridge on the radio sketch... "Alan takes on a professional US gambler Jack ‘The Black’ Calson and goes on to reveal his secret formula for winning at roulette: if...

The Martingale system [sic] applied to roulette is the epitome of so-called strategy nonsense...

This is the talk of a dangerous idiot. A thread like this will obviously attract people with gambling problems, some serious, and it is extremely unhelpful to be posting such utter, utter rubbish. Does anyone really believe that roulette would have survived for hundreds of years as a...

being a complete **** just about covers it