Search results

What the LEFT BACK you mean? The LEFT BACK who was signed on a season loan because our first choice LEFT BACK got injured. That LEFT BACK? So if we had our first and second choice LEFT BACKS injured then clearly a good move is to sign a 19 year old RIGHT BACK who has NEVER played a senior...

Another one? How could you possibly know this?

You're a Utd fan aren't you?

I agree BUT he isn't our player, that is what I'm struggling with, IF he was our player I would agree with just about everything being said BUT HE'S NOT. We get what out of this deal? Chelsea get a 'prospect' off their payroll for 6 months and get to have a look at how he does with a bit of...

Name one. When you do consider the loan system came into existence after Giggs made his debut and also consider how many they send out on loan every year that are never heard of again.

If we signed a full back because we knew Bong and Liam were out long term, then that is no longer 4th choice. It was not the time to gamble, if we were going to only go for loans in January then they needed to be proven and/or experienced. Not players who have literally not played a full...

HE IS NOT OUR PLAYER FFS. I'm sure Alex Ferguson 'blooded' loads of loan players in 'big games'. Of course he flipping didn't, he let let teams like Brighton do it for him.

I think the point is that he isn't a left back, end of. That isn't his fault. Pocognoli going off and being replaced by a 'not a left back' seriously affected the team's balance and I don't think we recovered. I don't think this lad is any better than Hunt, so I'm struggling with the whole...

Some of the responses to this thread beggar belief. You lot do actually know that he is NOT our player don't you? "He's one for the future..."; "He's just a kid...."; "He'll be great in a year or two..." that was my personal favourite. He may be all of those things and good luck to the lad...