Search results

No idea - but now, I'd say Chelsea (still such a basket case and will continue to take time to settle down) and West Ham (on our day and with players fit, I think we are better than them).

I voted 8th and getting out of the group at start of season - if we'd had a more "par" season injury wise I think we would've achieved at least this, so I'm happy.

Given the injuries, I agree.

I'm not certain that's the worst thing. We are very poor against sides who choose not to take risks against us. The title contenders will HAVE to take risks to ensure a win. I think we're in for a whole load of very spicy games coming up.

The good thing is there is no way we're only getting 3 points from; Man City Liverpool Brentford Arsenal Burnley

It's almost like we've had a fuckload of key injuries/absentees in the middle of the season.

Understood, except we all know that an “easy” start doesn’t necessarily mean that for us, given we are often worse against worse sides who sit 11 behind the ball, and better against better sides who leave space for us to play in. AND we are due our squad being massively bolstered in the coming...

We’re 7th right now, so actually we’d have to get worse to not make Europe via the league.

Thought this was interesting and relevant, after a quick Google;

Is it strange that we are 7th, yet 5 points behind the European tracker? What league position does 60 points normally get you?