Did we actually play that badly in the World Cup? Nope. Nowhere near as badly as 2010 considering opposition.
It was moments of individual brilliance from Balotelli and Suarez that saw us not get through a very tough group, a group that swallowed up Italy too.
It's not even just that though. The SAME teams we would more often than not beat very comfortably in qualifying/friendlies, we will struggle against in a tournament situation. See: Algeria, Slovenia, Trinidad & Tobago, Ecuador.
You take the exact same teams from last night and drop them into a...
He's referring to the standard of football. Some people do wear rose tinteds when it comes to "old football", as evidenced earlier in the thread. See Mo Gosfield's post, hard to believe but it does seem to making out that footballers were generally better in the 60s than now.
Frustratingly meaningless how good we can look in friendlies and qualifiers. This same fixture in Euro 2016 would probably see us nervously drawing 1-1 at the moment.
The most notable deficiencies are the defending and positional sense. In the clip I saw, roughly every 10-20 seconds someone would do something that would be considered close to a "howler" nowadays by Championship standards, let alone top level.
I get that people have fond memories of the sport they grew up with but I'm fully prepared that in 50 years time people will look back and laugh at the football we see now. It's a game that's constantly evolving and improving, footballers have become proper athletes now.
Sorry, are you GENUINELY trying to suggest that the players you've listed above are better than modern top level footballers?
Glen Johnson has scored better goals than anyone on your list. That's GLEN JOHNSON, a very average prem player nowadays. Football is lightyears ahead of 40 years ago...