Search results

I thought it was a cross-cum-shot but the point is it created the goal and if Kaz had done it everyone would be w**king themselves silly over it.

Heard abuse for Barnes even after he was off the pitch, when Crofts (I think it was) made a mistake. Brilliant.

Way to not address my points. :wink:

He's not going to ask to be paid LESS is he? Let's live in the real world for a second. As I said - fair enough if that player isn't TRYING, but if they are giving 100%, how can you have a go? It's not THEIR fault if they aren't good enough, is it?

I actually think both he and Ulloa (in his one game back before getting injured) have regressed a bit in terms of going down WAY too easily. Looks really poor.

Obviously not, but I just don't get it. Sure, I'll feel disappointed and annoyed when a player doesn't do the basics, but standing up and screaming "YOU ARE SHIT"? What exactly is that meant to achieve? Do you really think the player was just thinking how brilliant they were at that moment, and...

But what is it you are abusing that player FOR? Not being good enough at football? That's almost like an "ism", like abusing someone for the colour of their hair, their gender, the fact they wear glasses, etc, etc.

I can understand verbal abuse of a player who clearly isn't putting effort in, or jumping out of tackles etc (Dobbie, Harley) but to abuse a player who is giving it 100% but just isn't quite up to it is BAFFLING. What's the logic? Genuinely, what's the thinking?