Search results

Absolutely. You've nailed it there. Simply getting a touch on the ball does not constitute a fair challenge and is the point a lot of our fans are missing.

Well I certainly thought that originally and I might add that I still thinks it's a penalty. However, albeit aided by ' blue and white ' specs bias and i can see the basis of the argument for it not being a penalty. It's apparent that nobody is quite sure of the relevance of getting a touch on...

First half he was shocking and that ridiculous free kick signalled the start of it.

So what we can conclude is that nobody is quite sure of the relevance of getting a touch on the ball in the decision making process for adjudging a foul. And if there is a relevance is it consistently applied?

Are yo for Are you for real?

Are yo for Are you for real?