Search results

Indeed. Absurdly it might have been better if he fails to control it and/or blasts wide or even hits the deck. We then get to surround the ref and suggest he looks for the push. With respect to Mitoma I'm not sure his reaction helps us much. He looks a bit sheepish as if almost an admission that...

What's all this wailing and gnashing of teeth? When Howard calls RDZ to apologise on Monday we'll all feel so much better for it :ffsparr:

Just wow! By contrast on first viewing I thought it was the hand. However, as you say they have numerous chances to review and ultimately see that it only hits his hip.

Indeed. And I'm not buying the proximity argument for not giving the second one. From up in my WSU seat I thought it was the right call originally. However, seeing the replay we've seen plenty given this season where that arm has been judged to be in an unnatural position and tough luck if you...

Yes they deliberately showed it to stoke the crowd up. Also can't believe the pundits didn't see it as a penalty. No need for keeper to put his glove on the shin and the clincher is that the forward genuinely stumbles whilst looking to stay on his feet.

Really interesting that in the Forest game they showed the crowd on the big screen the penalty incident with the keeper Henderson. Ironically they showed the angle that least evidenced a penalty so none too clever. From the behind the goal angle I think you can see the keeper knock the players...

Indeed a little too old to carry off those jeans. Easily worth a yellow :)