Search results

Good forum etiquette not to, in my book. Have been guilty of it in the past when I was learning the ropes but you can kick me if you see me do it again :)

No problem with criticising others' views on players but can you make a tiny bit of an effort to be less of a sourpuss about it? It's player form, not families starving at foodbanks or kids being bombed. And criticising a player for an unsteady start is not "writing them off". If your arguments...

That's an utterly daft counterfactual that is totally unprovable. I probably wouldn't make the case for Murphy as a guaranteed starter because his form is too fitful but the game yesterday was tailor-made for his breaking strengths, given the space Norwich were leaving behind going forward...

Oh my god report me to the mods and the Amex stewards for criticising a player :lolol: What is it about free speech on a relatively unimportant subject as player form that churns your guts out? Come on, arguing the toss about players and occasionally getting it wrong is one of the great...

Here's another saddo grinding an old personal axe rather than deal in good faith with a potentially interesting debate about a player. You can instantly disregard anything this guy says because he won't criticise any player, as that would tarnish his trainspotting superfan credentials. Can...

lol he can tackle to be fair

Lovely that you can't let it go that I called you out on your disgusting comments about Australian aboriginals. Putting the wind up blatant racists like you is one of the great pleasures of using this site. I guess my racism is racism against white people??, can't work out what your are...

Murphy has been picked ahead of Skalak this season so Hughton has given him his chance. It's not quite happened for him though, has drifted out of games too much after lively spells and now Hughton has gone back to the crossing of Skalak- there's not a lot in it though - it's the same as the big...

lol here's Simster's aboriginal-hating brother successfully ignoring me again. To be fair at least he isn't claiming to be some kind of footballer like his fellow genetic puddle :)

Ha ha yes and of course your life spent as some kind of IT monkey has given you invaluable insights about football - do **** off Simster you little whelp

So to sum up - your contribution here is a) to say "retarded" and b) to frantically scramble back from saying we have less threat down Knocky's wing Great work :)

Fair enough

I don't think Hughton is that convinced. He's interchanged with Murphy but the Scot hasn't put a 90 minute performance in yet, LuaLua may always be to fitful for CH so the spot is there to be taken by Solly - provided he regains top form

Yes your post suggesting that we have less attacking threat down Knocky's is laughable trolling nonsense

Almost as many as the Norwich keeper

Quite right Knocky is hanging onto his spot by his fingernails :)

I don't even know who you are so you can take a break or not, the outcome appears the same :)

Well I'm not doing that usually crappy argument thing of saying he offers nothing (his work finding space for the second goal was good) but moments of attacking quality like that are just too rare - I think we will need more than his solid virtues to claim top 2. If you recall Solly's pre injury...

He's bang average. My heart sinks every time the ball is played into space on to his wing - we know what's coming, there's no way he can beat a man so we have to be grateful that he stops, manages to keep possession and plays the ball backwards or inside, all impetus in any break lost. Praying...