Search results

Never mind the facts though. There are papers/advertising space/political agendas to boost. They must be "terrorists".

It's already been confirmed that this was not a lone shooter. It was also not considered a terrorist attack (by most people) when the white supremacist kid shot up that black church. Despite the fact that he was politically/ideologically motivated. Pedantry aside you know what I'm saying.

Define "terrorist". They don't all have brown skin. Anyone who does something like this is a terrorist, regardless of their race, religion or motivation. Really grinds my gears when something truly awful like this happens and people say "was it a terrorist attack?". Of course it was! You mean...