As I'm on to get my MA degree in Politics, which includes Law - yes, obviously. Of course, it would be wrong for me to judge without evidence - which include Malky's own admission of guilt on behalf on the texts being sent. So for me, and the overwhelming majority on NSC, we would not want a man...
Looks like - despite his shameful comments. Whelan is ready to interview him for the job.
If he was avaliable would you go for him? For me, I hope we wouldn't just on an ethics basis.