Search results

Because I'm talking about booing a sub that was an obvious one (of 2) to make - and the booing was from the North Stand.

Most managers make 1 sub at a time to only disrupt one position at once. It was REALLY obvious this was going to happen - Jose was clearly about to come on as well. Poor from North stand to boo a change to 442 when it was clearly needed.

The existing one was rubbish and this was the first of 2 quick subs to go two upfront - would you not have gone 442 when losing?

Like for like for 2 mins before bringing on the 2nd sub - it was clear he was about to go 2 upfront. Would you have kept Andone on as the lone striker? Murray and 2 up top was the way to go - this was not why we lost 5-0!

But it was obvious it was the first of 2 quick subs and that we were about to go 2 upfront. Jose was clearly the next to come on and it was obvious that Locadia would then go upfront. These were the right subs imo - no idea why fans booed them.

There was so much to boo today and it truly was awful BUT I don't get why this sub was booed? Andone had been awful and it was obvious at this time that we would be going 442 with Jose about to come on as well. At that stage in the game switching to 2 upfront (Murray and Locadia) seemed the...