Search results

Well then i think a strongly worded letter of complaint to the FA is in order 👍

Intent is not needed to punish dangerous tackles, but it is needed for violent conduct

Are we still doing this? Of course intent is relevant when it comes to throwing punches.

If we want VAR to only intervene when there is a clear and obvious mistake, then we're going to get inconsistency based on the refs decision on the day. If you want complete consistency then VAR has to continually intervene.

Plsyers grab for the ball all the time ìn every match when it's being kept from them, often when a throw in has been awarded. I don't really want to see a spate of reds for that :p Yes the ball is much lower down, but to be fair so is Billy's head :lolol: He's a very small man....

Cause its completely accidental and he's not even trying to be physical against Gilmour's body, like someone pushing a player in the chest, he's trying to grab the ball that Gilmour was keeping from him. That's why.

Nobody thought the Paulinha one wasnt a red card. That was intent. This one wasn't intent, it shouldn't be a red.

People really think that was a punch? He's going for the ball and catches his face by accident. If that's a red card it's absolutely ridiculous.