Search results

Why do they need to compromise though? The proposals were to increase the allowable loss limits. If FFP is watertight (big if!) then a legal challenge may be useful in order to confirm that.

Right, ok. That is the first time I have seen that clause interpreted that way. Interesting. Thanks :thumbsup:

Yes, I read that too. I understand it is wrong, but the football league page I linked too above still has it being distributed amongst the clubs, but that page has not been updated for ages. So I assume it is now going to charity.

Yes, that's what I meant - based on those figures. We will not know this seasons figures until December, but I was just taking those as a guide. Re the relegated clubs, I thought they were excused in the first year unless they got promoted? That is what is says here...

Interesting that Barnsley have issued a legal challenge to FFP, yet support the rules! So based on those figures, at least 6 clubs will have transfer embargoes under FFP (assuming we have reduced our losses and others have not). Add Bournemouth to that probably. It seems likely that Leicester...