Search results

I don't understand the Guardian's reference to "significantly reduce debts". Elsewhere it's stated that the new investment hasn't diluted Parrish's stake, so presumably no new voting shares have been issued. Which presumably means that Textor has acquired his shares from an existing shareholder...

It would do, if they were voting shares, and the shares were issued and subscribed for by Textor alone. I read somewhere that Parrish's shareholding is unchanged, so what seems to have happened is that Textor has bought shares from one or more existing investors (presumably the ones who invest...