Search results

Fair enough, I was wrong. This clarifies it I think? http://www.skysports.com/f1/news/12433/11302323/australian-gp-how-mercedes-were-beaten-to-first-2018-win-by-ferrari Edit,I seem to have found the same explanation at the same time as Marty_McFly

If Hamilton had slowed down more than he had to we could both be right? Once Vettel pitted Hamilton was in the lead, he should have been told by his team. I didn’t watch the actual incident as I switched on afterwards, so I may be wrong but that is how it came across to me.

Hamilton was in the lead, he dictates the pace, and slowed down rather than going quickly although not an illegal flat out. Well that’s my understanding anyway. Hence him asking the team why they hadn’t told him that Vettel was pitting, as he would have gone faster, to which they had no answer...

Mercedes feck up with “on the hoof” strategy too often for the leading team imo. How hard was it for them to tell Hamilton to speed up once Vettel pitted? Own goal there by Mercedes. I believe they lost the last Australian Grand Prix due to a strategic cock up too, bringing Hamilton in and...