Search results

Got something to say or just want fewer pesky ads? Join us... 😊

  1. Icy Gull

    Forrestieri's red card v the disallowed "goal"

    No, but it is taken from an angle and angles as you suggest can be deceptive. Anyway have you got the overhead photo, that should surely be conclusive IF it's taken at the moment the ball stopped travelling into the goal and was booted out.
  2. Icy Gull

    Forrestieri's red card v the disallowed "goal"

    Can someone post a link to the overhead "no goal" photo that I see mentioned on the other thread and in the post above? I have seen two angles so far, is there a third?
  3. Icy Gull

    Forrestieri's red card v the disallowed "goal"

    That shot is taken from an angle with a post in the way but you sre certain that proves your point about the ball not being over the line whilst being absolutely certain that the shot taken from another angle that appears to show the ball to be over the line, with grass between it and the goal...
  4. Icy Gull

    Forrestieri's red card v the disallowed "goal"

    Some people don't believe their eyes if it doesn't suit their needs.
  5. Icy Gull

    Forrestieri's red card v the disallowed "goal"

    You can see grass between the goal line and the ball, yet people still think the ball may not have been over the line? I am happy to concede that it should have been a goal. I bet the voting would be close to 100% goal if it had been us who scored it and had it disallowed.
Albion and Premier League latest from Sky Sports


Top