Search results

No it doesn't :facepalm:

You believe in fate then? I don't personally.

Err... ok?

Really poor example, the glaciers were shrinking long before we started having a meaningful impact on the planet, and the reason they shrink is reduced precipitation more than increased temperature, but many of our models point towards increased precipitation.

Fair enough, although sadly there are a lot of people who wouldn't have it in their cheek and do have it in their house.

You are completely and utterly failing to see the difference between 'Science' and the Media. Science says things like 'hmm, one day Yellowstone park could erupt in a very large way' and the media which says things like 'YELLOWSTONE OVERDUE TO OBLITERATE ENTIRE PLANET.' You need to stop reading...

Yes but the question is has our cutting down of trees had an impact on the planet? You don't think it has? It's not a question of relatives it's a yes or no thing. And the planet has not been like THIS for 4 billion years, it hasn't 'endured' meteor strikes, massive volcanic eruptions or total...

:facepalm: So are you trying to argue that we have not, ever had ANY impact on the world around us? Deforestation was nothing to do with us, the trees just happened to die on their own because of the sun, is that what you are saying?

The issue is the attempt to link individual events to climate change. Climate looks at weather trends over long periods of time. (30 years or more) But everyone seems very keen to say that this bit of bad WEATHER or this bit of bad weather is man made climate change when it's almost certainly...