As an aside what are your views about checking your bollocks for lumps? I mean, this isn’t a scientific way to determine you have testicular cancer is it? It’s “utterly unrealistic” etc etc and could just be a boil. Same with breasts. Should we dispense with both of these as well as BMI?
I find it amusing that he uses an Olympic gold medalist to prove his idea it’s “utterly unrealistic”. :lolol:
I mean, how “realistic” does one expect your height and weight to be as an all encompassing measurement of ones health? Im baffled anyone can believe it’s anything more that what it is...
It’s a simple guide, it flagged up your daughter, you (an adult) got a letter, and upon assessed this and other factors with the limitations of BMI decided nothing was wrong. Others might have decided a change in life-style might be needed. System seems to be working. Struggling to see what the...
I am not disagreeing it’s basic. As I said, it is what it is. If you look at the formula it’s obvious it has limitations as it only involves height and weight; everyone can see this. It’s an indicator, a guide, useful for assessing populations but not as good for individuals. The flaw is with it...
Fair play.
But I think it’s wrong to say BMI is flawed. It is what it is; an easy measurement to take and which, on its own, is nothing more than a guide. You need to consider other factors and measurements. Similarly heart rate doesn’t mean much on its own. Throw in systolic and diastolic...