I have a reasonable memory but repetition obviously aids the grey matter. And yes, we all know it’s where working class people live.....that’s your point. Have you been on the cider?
“I’m confident the reason will out in the fullness of time.” - really, you seem to think people might care or be...
It’s a lovely day and I’ve got better things to do than discuss this with you. So, I’ll do my “whatever”. You can Google some more stuff you don’t fully understand, mention something about the EU (as being banned from the main thread hurts you so much), call me a Tory shill and do your Alan...
Because it wasn’t felt it was in the child’s best interest. Parents are not always automatically right. The child was a vegetable. What use was it taking him to Italy, or do you believe in papal miracles?
I’m not sure of your point as the parents in the case we are discussing were listened to, numerous times in fact by many doctors, judges and the media. The point is not that they were not listened to...but more that they were listened and agreement about the future of their vegetative son could...
No, it doesn’t. If you read the law it neither assumes the parent or the doctor is correct. In cases where there is a dispute between the two the courts and experts take over and the child is put first. Besides, you simply can’t assume the parent is always correct; such a default can indirectly...