Search results

You're correct on the very last point.

Is it though? I have not been following this closely but I read one of her tests was just "marginally outside the normal range". As someone you understands a bit about lab data this alone doesn't really set off any alarm bells with me.

Good point. This isn't any different to a lot of commercial and academic institutions who are often happy to supply data, as long as you demonstrate you're qualified to analyse it.

Don't forget the Times scientist who "analysed" the data :lolol:

Does anyone know which specific lab test is being used? I know my way around lab data so I'm intrigued.