Search results

A bit of internet research suggests the funding for restoration is a mix of local and central funding. So governments are as much to blame for the rot.

I very much agree with this especially the last bolded bit. But, I also think a lot of the residents are also guilty of preventing building for the future as well. Brighton has a strong NIMBY attitude, the arcane Regency Society and locals with a bizarre idea that everything must fit in with...

Who is financially responsible for its upkeep though? Is the local council, government or a bit of both?

And my big bug-bear is that you can't build any new, exciting and challenging architecture in the city.

Who is responsible for the upkeep of the terraces? Is it the local council?