Search results

[/B] All very well in theory - but what is right exactly? Your mention of the few gives the game away and I can't help feeling that your final mention of 51% contradicts what you actually say you want. Presumably you want to deny the 51% the right to have what they voted for? That is...

Yes, I see what you are saying, but it is somewhat naive to assume that with PR or whatever system you want, MPs won't shout at each other, and also work together for the country -they will still be of the same ilk, with allegiances that sadly mean that the party will always come first...

Yep, they seem to be booming economically, so far as I can gather.

Yes, I can see that would be frustrating, but exactly the same happens in reverse in say urban areas where the broad mass of voters will always vote labour. as long as you are consisitent . .

[/B] Yes, more would have voted, but I doubt that would have made the whole situation easier -there would still be the same arguments that it was a close-run thing and attention should be paid to the losers.