Search results

This one takes the biscuit, even by your tendency to exaggeration. So all nurses go to food banks do they? And then you call someone else a fool.

Nice try. That audience was hardly the gentle tolerant type!

Agree 100% or as they say on MOTD 110%. The mob is getting ever more aggressive and I am sure that this explains why relatively few Tory supporters put posters out. Here in Hastings, there are not many posters and the only Tory one that I have seen, was defaced. And given a post last week, when...

Are we being very clever tonight? or just that shade immature again?

Yes, true to form, sadly.

What do you mean? who is satisfied? Presumably those who have bought JC's goodie bags and think -Oh, it's free, I must vote for that, with out giving a thought as to who will foot the final bill.

Given the sweeping nature of these claims, perhaps it is you who is the pathetic child? Perhaps also someone of your intellect can tell us what is happening, since no Tory voter on here and thus presumably millions further afield, knows.

I was thinking of selected minsters plus their civil servants -quite how you jump to the conclusion that implicit in my statement is that they will win is beyond me -I did not mean any such thing. Do you not think that perhaps Labour have also thought about strategies for Brexit as well - anyone...

Sadly, one can be intelligant, as you put it, and very misguided.

For pompous rambling, this surely takes the biscuit! Millions will vote Tory on Thursday, and yet none of these people see any benefit to them or indeed the country. The Turkeys are truly thick, aren't they? But you can see through it all.

What does this say about you, I wonder . . .

You may be right, my friend, you may not be -do you know who is putting in the leg work for Brexit exactly and who is concentrating on the election? At least you are gracious enough to say that it is now a "suspicion" and no longer pure and simple!

Again pure conjecture on your part, but at least the "either or" is better than "pure and simple" when you could not be in a position to make such a definitive statement. I don't know about our level of preparedness -or otherwise - and, be honest, nor do you.

It is those last words that seem so odd. Given that you are nowhere near government, you could not possibly be in a position to make such a definitive statement. Might it just be that some or even much preparation has gone on behind the scenes?

This is just you trying to lend some credence to your points - I very much doubt that this is the case in general, though in some cases it will undoubtedly be true. Older folk will inevitably have far more experience of life, and their particular "thoughtful" will clearly reflect this, meaning...

Probably best not to joke about it. Given the hate that some of Corbyn's supporters can show (yes, it can happen on both sides, I appreciate) the combined sentence of 87 years will be the going rate for people who do not come to the "correct" view.

[/B] Don't be so pathetically simplistic with your sweeping statement. No one supports what you are claiming, and in any case what you describe has been going for ages, as you well know. Last week, I heard the police federation Chairman say that his officers had also used food banks, much to...

It is of course your right to decide that you are voting Labour due to your admiration of Corbyn. You might, however, like to reflect that his OWN party in 30 years has not once seen him as idea ministerial calibre - and someone so inexperienced in government, who, let's face it, has come over...