Search results

Thanks. Of course, that is the point -it was attitudes at the time and doubtless news of the hardships suffered by the peasantry under collectivisation, plus the many other murders of political opponents would have had extensive coverage, if only perhaps for propaganda purposes. Ironically...

A very interesting question. Millions of Germans, a maximum of 40% of the population, voted for Hitler, though the rough antics of the brownshirts would not have left anyone under any illusion as to what might be expected, should the Nazis have gained power, though prior to1933,no one...

You were commenting on a post which was really good, and then this offensive contribution comes along. Much later than 1933, to which the other post alluded, it would have been totally clear what Nazism stood for, and certainly the longer the war dragged on. There is not a shred of evidence that...

Yes, good post and I certainly see what you are saying. Likely? Not likely? Quite likely? Who knows for sure, but thanks anyway.

You use of the word "taught" implies some degree of approval. It may simply be that in the 30s, this would have been seen on newsreels and the parents were showing her what it was. It is quite unlikely that the royal family was full of Nazi sympathisers.