Search results

On radio 5 now. Apparently Starmer is "The most unpopular leader of the opposition since records began - in a party with such a massive lead in the polls" What? He sounds very young and excitable, like a polytechnic student who has taken some amphetamines.

Indeed. Sadly HMG is about trying to convince the 90% of us between no tax and some tax that they will massively do us a massive service if we vote them in. Yes, indeedy. I liken it to religion. As an athiest, I could go Catholic and repent on my death bed and go to Heaven, but I wouldn't be...

Incidentally I love the fact this thread has no loner the tiniest f*ck whatsoever to do with the eponymous thread title. Jonesy has long since been put in the sea, and cast adrift in a beautiful pea-green boat with an owl and a pussycat. I hope he has some money and plenty of honey, but £5...

Of course. And yet I still suspect most of us plebs have no idea what we pay in tax. We just want to pay less. Anyway, I am in the high tax band and my desire to work hard and work well have nowt to do with tax. It never crosses my mind to slack off because the rate has gone up a tad. There...

No. Let them have them. But not as charities. As businesses. Paying business rate taxes. Oh, and also sticking to the National Curriculum. And no banning girls from sports, or teaching that some arse-god created the universe in 10 seconds while having a wank and that physics is therefore...

Well, that's something for the tories to boast about. Didn't see that coming. And yet.....did anyone notice? Or care? That's the funny thing about tax.

Exactly my plan. Same as it was with Blair. That didn't pan out in the end. But it was infinitely better than pipple like that Tory who said pipple, and Seb Coe's 'exercise chum' and that other arse that Blair beat, running the country. Blair transformed the UK. He took the **** out of...

Socialists you say? He's a 110% capitalist, with the pound in his pocket his main interest. And possibly bitcoin.

He may influence 200,000 votes in the GE. That's what? 1% per constituency? It may fill the Macarana stadium but it won't win a seat. The puffed-up twat.

Did some idiot I have on ignore actually demand an answer to this dumb question . . . again. Just tell them to f*** off. Its so much more final ??? :wink:

He looks young because he's photoshopped his phizzog. This is what he really looks like

I think we'd all like his views just to be different :wink:

Yes. They are f***ing stupid. "No compromise with the electorate". Starmer has hardly anyone left to sack. And he dispatched the ones that are gone without fuss. Hardly anyone even noticed. Even I hadn't noticed Abbot lost the whip. Grown up politics.

To respond to your points, the liberals and greens are promising a hot meal and a shiny toy for every child, an end to hospital waiting lists, and a reinstatement of the left right divide you find so irrelevant. Fill your boots. It's what Owen wants.

Even a broken clock is correct twice a day. It isn't just the 'what', it is the 'how' and the 'for what purpose'? Keeping to tories in power so that his cool rebel persona can continue to be monetized?

Welsh watersports?

They can f*** off. My guess is Starmer will have a safe majority of Starmzies in the next intake. The wankers can plot their wanker war on the back benches. If they manage to get elected. I don't remember the parliamentary labour party being run by the hard left since......er.....never...

But not actual Momentum, I hope :lolol: Look, none of us know what Starmzy will be like. We can only guess and I'm bored with that. Before Blair got in he was painted as weak Bambi, in thrall to the unions and the looney left. Turns out that not being a **** and largely going with what you...

I wish I'd read your post before tumbling into the whirlpool of subsequent twaddle. It was after Corbyn was begone that I (re)joined. It's strange how people who might have largely laudable values absolutely ruin themselves with a hysterical lack of composure, unrealistic expectations, and an...

If he's referring to Starmer, I agree. The statement would be absurd.