Search results

Wow. A union leader whose salary is paid to a significant extent by the bosses. That makes even the US 'Teamsters' of the 1950s pale into insignificance. And yes, a reactionary old cuntandahalf to boot. And he has been in power almost as long as Robert Mugabe was. FFS. So there is a story here...

Sadly my voice is insufficiently dreary and nasal, and I have views and opinions, some of which become formulated into clever and constructive ideas.

Yes. Bang on. I think we are in agreement. Right, if its that easy to deal with a moderately nuanced issue, surely we can now team up with Buzzer and . . . . fix Brexit...... :lolol::shootself:rock:

Good reply, and I agree with you. Stand by for a thread on how awful it is how much players are paid, and pop singers. :facepalm::lolol::thumbsup: (ps - my guess is almost none of his members knew what he earns, and perhaps quite a few might start griping. Especially lads playing for the likes...

Exactly. And put so much more succinctly than my explanation :lolol:

But....how come he has been in this job for 30 ish years and paid all this dosh? I am in a union. I can vote for the leader. I can get elected on to the finance committee that determines her salary (ours is a woman). Presumably his members think he's worth his cash lake? What business, then, is...

Yes....but....isn't he merely a union leader? What company is he running, and where can I buy shares?

Well, presumably the members are happy with this. And if they are not they are not obliged to join the union. I'm in no position to comment on whether he is value for money. Can anyone comment?