Agree it wasn’t private when it was put up but it’s still between the uncle and his nephew. Those who follow are voyeurs, nothing more. On this thread he has been called a c**t, a cock, should be pitchforked, a prat, that he should lose his MBE etc. Yet he hasn’t broken any laws, he even...
No he’s not, he’s a young man having some banter with his nephew, who may or may not think he’s his uncle is a knob as he grows up. That’s their business. As far as I am aware what he did is not against the law. He is not in public office, he has no higher standards to uphold. Long may Hamilton...
Fair post. The link is who makes the judgement what’s right and wrong. The law steps in as it sees fit, fine, not sure in this case we need others to do so when there is no legal issue.
On the out of workplace comments and they can rant as much as they like, it seems they can unless it is about...
But what if people didn’t know the background of the person presenting? Here are many students who disagree with you, who think it’s unacceptable It seems though you are ok on free speech on certain self defined boundaries and a family video by Hamilton overstepped your sensitivities.
Thx. You keep wanting to stifle free speech, just asking where you draw the line. It seems to be anyone who doesn’t share the same definition as you on common sense and has a high profile. Hmmmm
Of course he will, he is one of the U.K.s and worlds top sportsman. A bit of light hearted and to be fair silly banter with his nephew is neither here nor there. But presumably he thinks he has upset people and has apologised. So now we can all move on.
I think it is.
From an interview in Autosport. https://www.autosport.com/f1/feature/3623/fangio-interview-with-a-legend
There was also his avoidance of the carnage at Tabac during the 1950 Monaco Grand Prix, the famous incident that prompted the 'reconstruction' film sequence at Rampoldi's...