Search results

Yes, that's one of the examples I was thinking of. He outright lied and she should have nailed him, instead he had the last word.

I don't how that marks her as anti-Brexit, quite the reverse. FWIW, I think she's been pretty straight. She clearly can't stand Corbyn but that doesn't mark her as pro or anti Brexit. I think she does try to be neutral on the matter. It's the Today programme that's quite clearly pro-Brexit...

As I posted earlier though, what would be in it for the Tories? Farage is not going to give the Tories a free run for nothing but what can the Tories offer? Pulling out of a number of winnable seats, a dozen, say? That won't go down well with the PPCs, many of whom may decide to stand anyway...

Yes, good point that. But proportionally more off Tories

No. It had zero chance of being passed. Tories had a majority of two but Elphicke would certainly have voted to support Johnson, O'Mara's absent and would have abstained and at least one Labour MP (Hoey) would have voted down a NC vote. That means that there was a requirement for at least four...

But Corbyn chose not to take it because he knew that it had zero chance of getting passed - and that may have been the only crack at a no confidence vote. We know that there were discussions about it but any no-confidence motion needs some Tory votes and the word relayed from the discussions...

There's an interesting paradox here though. BP's chance of getting any real power is to do a deal with the Tories so they stand aside in some constituencies and the Tories stand aside in a few too. Under this deal, Farage would be given a cabinet seat. But if they start polling too weakly...