Search results

So, as a serious point, I really think this depends on the sport. Personally, I find women's tennis far better than men's (no, not because of the 'grunting' but because it's skill based, rather than strength based). Women's gymnastics is far more graceful and better to watch. Athletics is just...

He obviously doesn't know and needs the BBC to tell him.

I wouldn't dare to accuse you of that, and to an extent I agree. But why shouldn't they? Every other media organisation that's considered mainstream here promotes their own content. Why should the Beeb be exempt? The answer definitely isn't 'because we pay a licence fee'. Most people pay more...

He expected it himself :lolol: Normally, when that happens........

You've probably not read the first post then :thumbsup:

No it's not. England women are playing tonight. England men aren't because there's a full PL programme on. Only an idiot would get it wrong. Or a sexist.

Really? If the women's teams of both clubs were playing tonight and the mens teams weren't playing till March you'd find that difficult? :wozza:

That wasn't the OP's point at all. You can presumably tell the difference between Bellingham and Russo as well? Athletics, Tennis and Gymnastics are sports that are competed in by both sexes but called by one name. That's what triggered him, the massive snowflake.

Do you demand the same of Tennis and Athletics? What about Gymnastics?

No. No they didn't. Can you think why?

10 second look at tonight's fixtures would have told you in advance. Much better to be outraged by the news though :lolol: