Search results

We're defiantly loose :down:

It is what it is :shrug:

No, I'm not. I think people got carried away with previous tests, but Australia are no mugs, so it was bound to be tough.

This won't be a popular opinion, I'm sure – and one from a slightly removed perspective, but I'm really enjoying the contests, even though England look like they are going to lose three in a row. There's probably been more excitement in these three tests so far than in some previous series –...

Makes up for the team not getting the catches they 'deserved' then :shrug: :thumbsup:

Ali IN! :lolol:

My point, which Stokes has proven, is that you never really know what might've happened – and you certainly can't predict what WILL happen. Who would've expected England to get anywhere near Australia's total when they were 142-7 or 167-8? Pretty much nobody, I'm guessing. Yes, mistakes were...

There's a time and a place...!

It has, but even if all the chances were taken, there could've been someone else in the Aussie lineup who could've got a big score and the game situation would be the same. Just because one thing does or doesn't happen, it doesn't mean that everything else that follows would've been the same.

We've got Wood!

There's the live blog/feed, but maybe the BBC Sport staff are too tied up with Wimbledon coverage to produce bespoke reports?

For context, though, Australia have missed seven chances. Clearly not as bad, but mistakes do happen.