Hezbollah, although who supplied them the weapons could be murky. Assad was known to have tried to give them an arms shipment a few months ago which they apparently denied. But we all know who they're good friends with though. Those pesky Iranians, who'd love to provoke the U.S in to action...
Of course all the Assad generals, politicians and advisers will be all held up in public buildings which they know that the Americans know are all whilst they know an U.S attack is imminent.
Chances are, they have a war room or a few which happen to be underground in the event of an emergency.
You're joking? re-read what you're saying.
Hezbollah is fighting on Assad's side. Lebanon is within firing range of Syria. Who says they were fired within Syria?
What an appalling response.
Seeing as no one responded to my claims that Hezbollah may well be the culprits, I'll leave these here:
http://www.timesofisrael.com/rebels-say-assad-transferred-chemical-weapons-to-hezbollah/
http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-4394620,00.html...
I'm not overly convinced it was Assad, I can't see it being a logical attack given the threats from Western nations. But at the same time, I cannot see it being the rebels at the same time. Watching Lebanon at the moment, is there a possibility it could have been Hezbollah to try and stir...
I would fully expect Tories to rebel and vote against the whip. This could save them their seat in the next general election, the campaigns are starting to get planned now as we speak. Also it'd be common sense.
No British involvement: No more blood on already bloodied hands.
It doesn't matter if he wins or loses. There's no constitutional law to state that the executive must have the permission of either house for war, unlike the U.S who's Senate in theory should be the one to vote on the declaration of war (but has not since world war 2). We don't enjoy checks and...