Search results

Sadly or perhaps fortunately, my views don't carry the weight to have that kind of influence. You mention quite highbrow choices for president. Imagine though that it were the lowest denominator type candidate. Jordan, Rylon (or whatever he's called) or probably worse entities I am unaware of.

Lazy or realistic? Personally I think that's what would happen.

I like those suggestions. Perhaps if we had a President, disqualifying criteria could be that one had ever held any political office?

Yeah, imagine, God forbid, that we depose the monarch and install a President. What a nightmare. Presidents are not nearly as interesting as royals, and we'd also be committed to another election. President Blair, Johnson, Corbyn anyone?

It's not nonsense at all. It will be swallowed up by government. But it's a generous gesture at least and it's the opposite of what you were suggesting.

Quite the contrary. Could have made up to a billion but gave it to the people. https://www.reuters.com/world/uk/king-charles-give-back-windfall-wind-farms-2023-01-19/ I am not a huge royalist and will go to see the match if it's on that day, but this thread is like a political thread in that it...