Search results

Yeah, I know they're different. I included both because there are elements of both his brief reply - at least to my eye. Mind you, I've not been offered a teaching post in either subject.

You should teach Ethics & Logic, you should.

Hang on The Clamp. You agree with DH12 here, but previously you said The second sentence places a limit on the first. I'm confused by your stance. Is it "A woman can do what she wants with her body" or is it "A woman can do what she wants with her body, providing she doesn't choose to do...

Yes, you can. And, like you, I do.

There is that. I deliberately avoided mention of religion in my earlier post posing a rational defence for the decision taken by these guys. However, it's very hard to exclude it when combining their stance on abortion with their stance on the death penalty - now we're just into the realms of...

Or, in THEIR eyes, 27 men decided on behalf of their State to ban women and Doctors from murdering unborn babies. The issue of abortion is a proxy for the issues of South v North (read Confederate v Union, and poor v rich, and uneducated v educated) in the US. Both sides of the debate...