Search results

That's so far off the mark, it's laughable. What is trolling is when a rival fan makes a post which, in its entirety says: "The truth has no place in football supporting and blind rivalry, tut tut tut." It was this post that I responded to in a way that was considered and pointed out facts...

...

Nope, the only difference is NOT that our owner has more more money than yours had. There's also the fairly major difference that ours has both committed to fund the club and, critically, has ensured that we have not put several small, local companies out of business, by buying...

yes, it really is. It'll take a couple of years for the dust to settle, but the FL's stance during that period to the inevitable challenges will define football's finances in the lower leagues for maybe a generation. I think that at least one club, probably more, will seek legal redress through...

The difference is that our debt is interest free, to our Chairman, who has committed to not calling that debt in. Your debt was to, inter alia, local small businesses trading on an arms-length basis who went bust and put people out of work when you refused/couldn't pay them. The truth has no...

It is inevitable that some clubs which have overspent who get promoted and face fines, or who stay down and face transfer embargoes will challenge the FFP rules, possibly even taking legal action. What is more interesting to me is what our stance with the FL will be if the FL don't "rigorously...