I agree with you, but I find the emphasis of the stories on Doncaster Belles somehow being wronged seem to be based on rather weak points. By all means challenge Manchester City's right to get 'promoted' (on the basis of their infrastructure) if their results on the pitch don't justify a top...
Surely if a club finishes second from bottom out of eight clubs in the most recently completed league, it is possible to justify them starting in the second tier in the re-arranged league format?
It is bizarre that considerations of the current season are not being used, but if they are...
Thank you. Just to make sure I've got this right. Doncaster Belles finished second from bottom (7th out of 8 clubs) in the current top flight last season?
Could someone give some background to me as the links don't really provide it?
So the Women's League is being expanded and then split into two divisions with Doncaster Belles being placed in the second tier. Is that right?