Search results

Yep, that can go on the autocorrect list as well! :)

Hmmm ............. good point. The dilemma could, of course, be avoided by the appropriate use of commas.

Perhaps it's time for Bozza to apply a Mike Dean type solution? Any attempts to type should of, would of, could or had of would be autocorrected so that the 'of' appears as 'have' - a win/win situation - those of us who are rightly annoyed by the appalling grammar of 'should of' would be happy...

........ and Gurinovich.............