Search results

No, because the TV cameras caught it, and played it over and over, slowly, from all angles, causing sundry experts on TV who had played the game at the highest level and knew a bit about what was and what was not a penalty to unanimously agree with the rest of the world (except you) that it was...

Actually, it doesn't matter how many times you say it - it's still bo11ocks.

Ah ..... missed the word "against" March ...... :facepalm: As you were.................!

No, the question is still 'How would one not being given for us even things up for one wrongly given against us?' To even things up the ref would have had to give us a penalty that wasn't, and he didn't.

How would one not being given for us even things up for one wrongly given against us?

Why would it be an 'even things up' scenario? It was 100% a clear cut penalty. As was correctly analysed and shown in detail on MOTD.