I am sorry but what part of experienced strikers cost more money than that do you not understand. We got Turienzo because experienced strikers did not want to sign for us due to our lack of resources. I also did not realise that CKR was officially a waste of money, I think he has a lot of...
But when you have little money, you have to take gambles. Turienzo, Carole and Frutos were all gambles and two have paid off in my mind. Currie was a gamble and we got £250k back whereas Molango failed. That is how it works when you have a small budget.
But that is Archer and Stanley's fault for selling the Goldstone. Not McGhee's as he has brought in £2.5 million on transfers since December 2004 and that has gone to keeping us alive. The only money he has wasted is on Turienzo and I am sure that the other clubs that you mentioned have wasted...
So because I support Mark McGhee I also supported the people who wrecked this club permanently. I have rarely read a more moronic post than this and it just shows your lack of understanding of the situation we are in. Whatever anybody thinks about Mark McGhee everything he does is with the...
Do you know anything about Stoke? They spent £1 million on a striker in the summer. Luton spent about £150k on Vine and have also spent money on Feeney and Nicholls among others. Crewe are below us. QPR have spent money on Evatt, Shittu and I think Rowlands cost about the £350k that our whole...
Half a million is rubbish. £250k was spent on CKR including his wages for three years and everything else. That brings it down to about £350k. The vast majority of teams in this league have got a single player who they have paid more than that for.
I do not know Mark McGhee or any of the players but I do know the situation of the clubs. People like you seem to think that you can wave a magic wand, replace McGhee and all our problems will end.
That is crap. We will still be over 2 years away from getting a new ground. We will still have...