Search results

Didn't he know Law 11 either?

FFS, give up. Murphy was not in an offside position, no matter who touched or didn't touch the ball. I suppose you think that the Liverpool "onside/offside" on Saturday was actually onside because the pass came from the Liverpool half

Murphy was inline at worst. I would say he was slightly behind the defender (further away from the bye-line) so onside anyway.

LAW 11 – OFFSIDE Definitions In the context of Law 11 – Offside, the following definitions apply: • “nearer to his opponents’ goal line” means that any part of a player’s head, body or feet is nearer to his opponents’ goal line than both the ball and the second-last opponent. The arms are not...

My line is adjusted slightly for the camera angle, because the goal and 6yd lines are not actually parallel. The Ipswich player's right foot is in the air, and he is leaning toward the bye-line too, making it even more onside

He was inline at worst

FFS. It doesn't matter WHEN he put the ball in the net. If you're going to make (stupid) comments, learn the laws first. If the Liverpool situation on Saturday could be called onside, then this one most definitely was.